Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!mcvax!ukc!warwick!rpt
From: rpt@warwick.UUCP (Richard Tomlinson)
Newsgroups: net.physics
Subject: Fifth Force
Message-ID: <406@snow.warwick.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 11-Feb-86 08:01:12 EST
Article-I.D.: snow.406
Posted: Tue Feb 11 08:01:12 1986
Date-Received: Thu, 13-Feb-86 19:44:19 EST
Reply-To: rpt@snow.UUCP (Richard Tomlinson)
Organization: Applied Maths, Maths Institute, University of Warwick, UK.
Lines: 14

Expires:
References:
Sender:
Followup-To:
Distribution:
Keywords:
Xpath: ukc eagle

I have read the article on the "Fifth Force" in Physical Review Letters and I
find it hard to accept a theory based on a straight line graph with only 7
points plotted, one of which is so far from the line that it can be
discounted. They say that the slope of the graph is remarkably close to that
predicted by your formula but I think 6 points cannot be relied upon. When
someone can repeat the experiment with more materials then the theory can
be believed more easily.
  I will be very interested to receive people's comments.


   Richard Tomlinson
-- 

        ...!mcvax!ukc!warwick!rpt