Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: $Revision: 1.6.2.16 $; site inmet.UUCP Path: utzoo!lsuc!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!think!inmet!janw From: janw@inmet.UUCP Newsgroups: net.politics Subject: Re: Adverse effects of the Abolition of Message-ID: <7800940@inmet.UUCP> Date: Tue, 28-Jan-86 23:30:00 EST Article-I.D.: inmet.7800940 Posted: Tue Jan 28 23:30:00 1986 Date-Received: Thu, 6-Feb-86 10:47:07 EST References: <1245@pucc-i>.UUCP> Lines: 31 Nf-ID: #R:pucc-i>:-124500:inmet:7800940:000:1531 Nf-From: inmet!janw Jan 28 23:30:00 1986 [Radford Neal radford@calgary] >Some may say that the command economy of the USSR can divert a larger >proportion of the GNP to arms than NATO countries can (without provoking >adverse politcal reactions). Maybe, but several times more? I doubt it. I believe it *is* several times more. GNP estimates don't make much sense, in the absence of a common market where prices of goods would level off. But in *real* terms: what percentage of workers work in war plants; percentage of machine tools there, or of energy, steel, transistors etc. - "several times" is certainly true. >I think it's more likely that there is no great conventional imbalance, or >at least needn't be by the time the nuclear weapons are gone. I'll agree with the last statement (after "or"). Conventional weapons are high-tech now, and the West has every opportunity to outgrow the USSR. In fact, the opportunity may be *better* in conventional weapons because the technology is so diversified. In one field like ballistic missiles they can concentrate, steal our data and outdo us. A broad technical spectrum is different. It all depends on the way Western technology in general develops. When it stagnates or slows down, they can narrow the gap, and, in selected military fields, reverse it. When the West forges ahead, a society like the Soviet has no chance to compete. So, unleash technical innovation, let old industries die and new ones mushroom, and you get the defence problem solved as a by-broduct. Jan Wasilewsky