Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Path: utzoo!lsuc!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!ittatc!dcdwest!sdcsvax!ucbvax!brahms!weemba From: weemba@brahms.BERKELEY.EDU (Matthew P. Wiener) Newsgroups: net.politics Subject: Re: Adverse effects of the Abolition of Message-ID: <11620@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> Date: Thu, 30-Jan-86 07:49:35 EST Article-I.D.: ucbvax.11620 Posted: Thu Jan 30 07:49:35 1986 Date-Received: Thu, 6-Feb-86 10:52:11 EST References: <7800911@inmet.UUCP> Sender: usenet@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Reply-To: weemba@brahms.UUCP (Matthew P. Wiener) Organization: University of California, Berkeley Lines: 33 Summary: Why does USSR fear SDI? >That proposal is phony as a 4-dollar bill. Give up SDI now, >denuke by year 2000 ! IF they meant what they say about abolish- >ing nuclear weapons, why would they object to SDI so much? SDI >is only important (if at all) in the *presence* of strategic nu- >clear weapons. If Gorbachev meant one half of his proposal, he >could drop the other half. Why would they object? I'll tell you why. The number one personality problem Russians have is paranoia! (I'm not joking.) If a satellite can shoot down a missile in flight, how much easier it would be to blow it up in the silo. And why aim at the silos? Cities are bigger targets. And don't say, but the technology can't do that, because .... etc. Just because your president has said that SDI is only defensive doesn't mean it won't develop offensive uses ten years from now. Nobody REALLY knows what SDI could lead to--certainly not the Russians! If they believe that SDI will lead to new US offensive capabilities, if they believe that we could destroy their country in milliseconds (radio signal up, laser beam down), and if they believe the new American patriotism will continue to grow more militaristic (eg, SDI's very existence!), then I think they have reasons to fear SDI, having nothing to do with nuclear weapons. And then throw in their native paranoia, and yes, their objection seems quite natural. Notice that it does not matter whether the above SDI scenario is plausible or possible! If they THINK it could occur, they will of course object. Gorbachev's denuke proposal may or may not be phony, but I don't see how anyone can decide one way or the other from their SDI fears. ---------I find Americans' ignorance of the Soviet Union horrifying.--------- ---(This includes everyone from > above to the great Star Warrior himself.)-- ucbvax!brahms!weemba Matthew P Wiener/UCB Math Dept/Berkeley CA 94720