Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: $Revision: 1.6.2.16 $; site inmet.UUCP Path: utzoo!lsuc!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!inmet!janw From: janw@inmet.UUCP Newsgroups: net.politics.theory Subject: Re: How Opposite are Reason and Force? Message-ID: <28200659@inmet.UUCP> Date: Mon, 10-Feb-86 09:27:00 EST Article-I.D.: inmet.28200659 Posted: Mon Feb 10 09:27:00 1986 Date-Received: Fri, 14-Feb-86 21:12:13 EST References: <441@umich.UUCP> Lines: 37 Nf-ID: #R:umich:-44100:inmet:28200659:000:1483 Nf-From: inmet!janw Feb 10 09:27:00 1986 [kort@hounx --Barry Kort] >Nothwithstanding the rationalist view that the use of force is (generally) >an irrational behavior, we are nevertheless left with the reality that some >alloplastic agents in our society do habitually embrace force as a means >of attaining their goals. IRS and INS are prominent among these agents. >The dilemma of the rationalist is how to >protect his interests without returning violence for violence. In the cases above, one might vote or lobby ... >This dilemma vexed even Einstein, an avowed pacifist who later >urged (and then regretted) the use of atomic weapons. *Later* that, and before, simultaneously with pacifism, the So- viet revolution; and later, simultaneously with pacifism, Zionism and defense of Israel. He was awfully nice but inconsistent, through and through. His political views carry as little authori- ty as Newton's biblical exegesis. But you've switched to alloplastic agents *outside* our society (external enemies). That problem is hard, indeed. >It is easier to learn war than to learn peace. Read: to "learn" *them* peace. Democratic societies *are* peace- ful, it is a proven fact. While the planet is always covered with a rash of wars, there has never been a war between two democratic countries. They don't even arm against each other. The problem of war is solved, in principle: make all nations as free as (e.g.) Costa Rica. In practice, there are obstacles. Jan Wasilewsky