Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site ulowell.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!wanginst!ulowell!dobro
From: dobro@ulowell.UUCP (Chet Dobro)
Newsgroups: net.sci,net.philosophy
Subject: Re: Parapsychology and sloppiness
Message-ID: <192@ulowell.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 9-Feb-86 17:40:20 EST
Article-I.D.: ulowell.192
Posted: Sun Feb  9 17:40:20 1986
Date-Received: Tue, 11-Feb-86 05:25:08 EST
References: <899@decwrl.DEC.COM> <402@aoa.UUCP>
Reply-To: dobro@ulowell.UUCP (Chet Dobro)
Organization: University of Lowell
Lines: 15
Xref: watmath net.sci:520 net.philosophy:4132
Summary: 

In article <402@aoa.UUCP> carl@aoa.UUCP (Carl Witthoft) writes:
>	This parapsych stuff was run through the wringer 8 months
>ago in net.physics. It was hard work but we finally got the BS to
>stop showing up. Let's not go through another cycle of clowns and
>apologists wasting our time and net money "discussing" this "topic".

I don't know about anyone else, but I was not around 8 months ago, and I am
interrested in this topic. Parapsychology is getting around to being
classified as an 'official' science (I think it should have been long ago)
and thus should be allowed here (net.sci).

If certain people don't like the discussions, they can always not read them.


						Gryphon