Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site ucdavis.UUCP Path: utzoo!lsuc!pesnta!pyramid!decwrl!amdcad!lll-crg!ucdavis!deneb!ccrrick From: ccrrick@ucdavis.UUCP (Rick) Newsgroups: net.sf-lovers Subject: Re: Gene Wolfe: Book of the New Sun (Spoilers possible) Message-ID: <168@ucdavis.UUCP> Date: Sat, 8-Feb-86 22:40:11 EST Article-I.D.: ucdavis.168 Posted: Sat Feb 8 22:40:11 1986 Date-Received: Mon, 10-Feb-86 14:08:33 EST References: <194@analog.UUCP> <3840005@csd2.UUCP> <11683@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> <1090@watmath.UUCP> Organization: Cafe' Americain Lines: 38 I have read _The_Shadow_of_the_Torturer_, (first volume of _The_Book_of_the_New_Sun), but in almost a year have yet to continue with the rest of the book. In general, I found the writing murky and the tale rather disconnected. I found that I learned very little of the political system, social classes, economic systems or even recent history. This failure of Wolfe's to adequately inform varies directly with my failure to be interested in his tale. This seems to me to be particularly true in a story like this where so many of the characters seem to be insane and therefore take actions that appear illogical: Master Palaemon gives an extremely valuable sword to a man who never seemed to interest him and who ought to be sentenced to death. Agia and Agilus are insanely greedy, consider the bizarre excuses Agilus gives in the prison cell when he argues to be spared. The boatman is in a crazed state and Dorcas suffers from amnesia. The rationality of Dr. Talos, Baldanders and the stuttering man seem questionable to me as well. I understand that Wolfe wrote this book while employed at another job and typically wrote during the early morning hours, shortly after having awakened. This probably accounts for the dreamlike nature of the work, which many people seem to admire highly. I am less than enthusiastic about it; on the other hand, only reading the first book is probably tantamount to turning off Beethoven's 5th symphony in the middle of the second movement in terms of being fair to the author's complete message... But on the first hand, the author has the responsibility to make the first story accessible enough that the others will be read... In time, I may re-read the first book and give it another chance... One thing that intrigues me is the theory that Severian has lived this life before and that all the events depicted have been experienced by Severian not once, but twice. Anyone have any thoughts or theories on this? What made someone think of this rather unique thought in the first place? What evidence is there for it? -- --rick heli ... {ucbvax,lll-crg}!ucdavis!ccrrick