Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site cuuxb.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!mtuxo!drutx!ihnp4!cuae2!ltuxa!cuuxb!frye
From: frye@cuuxb.UUCP (frye)
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: I gotta agree with Pooh.
Message-ID: <378@cuuxb.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 5-Feb-86 09:46:43 EST
Article-I.D.: cuuxb.378
Posted: Wed Feb  5 09:46:43 1986
Date-Received: Thu, 6-Feb-86 21:12:14 EST
Distribution: net
Organization: AT&T-IS, Customer Support, Lisle, Il.
Lines: 33

Yeah, I do. There are no garauntees folks. I can see where
a person could think enough of another after a while and
ease him/herself into a role that fits the other's needs.
I'd have to think that the person would have to be within
tolerance to mould him/herself successfully though. With
all the possible personalitys out there, I can't see getting
all upset if a prospective mate won't or can't be The One
for me. I have been upset some by a failed relationship, but
I just get that way because I dislike going backwards and
being just friends again after I've had more than that out
of a relationship. Ummm, well, it just ain't progress is all
I can say. Aw hell, I get over it in time, but I have often
thought; "That's a damned shame. She's such a sweet lady.
Too bad we don't fill each other's needs". I've thunk it
before and I'll did it somemore I think so.

I guess I've lucked out. I've never had and lost a ladyfriend
who didn't help me find out something about me while she was
around. (Like, I snore, I hog all the blankets, I  ---naw,
jist kiddin'.)



WOMEN! --- YUM!(8-)



Who else?(8-)



Sure you're right.
Frye again.