Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/17/84; site mhuxt.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!js2j
From: js2j@mhuxt.UUCP (sonntag)
Newsgroups: net.women,net.singles
Subject: Re: Beach harassment
Message-ID: <1395@mhuxt.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 7-Feb-86 09:36:18 EST
Article-I.D.: mhuxt.1395
Posted: Fri Feb  7 09:36:18 1986
Date-Received: Sun, 9-Feb-86 06:18:40 EST
References: <8342@ucla-cs.ARPA> <2581@sdcrdcf.UUCP> <255@birtch.UUCP> <1167@homxb.UUCP> <118@ttidcc.UUCP> <2069@watdcsu.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill
Lines: 24
Xref: watmath net.women:8779 net.singles:10163

> >Imagine you are 5'2" tall and weigh 100 lbs.  You are an attractive man and
> >dress accordingly.  While sunning on the beach, in your bikini swim suit, a
> >6'4", 200 lb. homosexual man walks  up  and  tries  to  pick  you  up.  You
> >politely  decline  but  he  refuses  to  leave  and begins to show signs of
> >irritation at your continued rejections.  He finally leaves in a huff,  and
> >half  an hour later the same thing happens with a different man.  This goes
> >on all the time you're at the beach, every time your at the beach.
> >
> >Ladies:  Is the above a fair analogy?
> 
> Not quite.  Let's suppose, in addition, that your trunks can be undone
> at the back, and you have done so in order to get a nice even tan.
> Now, maybe, this analogy is a little fairer.
> David Canzi

      Now I get it!  David must find female backs every bit as sexually
stimulating and erotic as he imagines homosexuals find male buttocks.  Why
else would he think that his changed analogy is better?
      Sorry to be the one to have to tell you this, Dave, but you've got
rather unusual taste in bawdy parts.  Most guys aren't turned on a whole
lot by backs.
-- 
Jeff Sonntag
ihnp4!mhuxt!js2j