Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 (Tek) 9/28/84 based on 9/17/84; site hammer.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!tektronix!orca!hammer!seifert
From: seifert@hammer.UUCP (Snoopy)
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: Re: New Discussion (first meetings)
Message-ID: <1799@hammer.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 7-Feb-86 15:30:15 EST
Article-I.D.: hammer.1799
Posted: Fri Feb  7 15:30:15 1986
Date-Received: Tue, 11-Feb-86 04:05:29 EST
References: <705@leadsv.UUCP> <130400004@hpfcls.UUCP> <723@leadsv.UUCP> <1777@hammer.UUCP> <2579@gatech.CSNET>
Reply-To: tekecs!doghouse.TEK!snoopy (Snoopy)
Organization: The Daisy Hill Puppy Farm
Lines: 16

In article <2579@gatech.CSNET> flash@gatech.CSNET (John C. Flaspohler) writes:
>In article <1777@hammer.UUCP>, seifert@hammer.UUCP (Snoopy) writes:
>> 
>> The problem with this is that you will make the people who have gone
>> to the pain of getting an engineering degree mad at you.  (Would
>> you go to someone who calls him/herself a "doctor", but wasn't?)
>> 
>  I go to my advisor all the time, but people with MD's and DDS's (etc)
>often don't consider them to be doctors.

I didn't ask whether you would go to someone who wasn't a Doctor,
I asked if you would go to someone who claimed to be but wasn't.
Significant difference there.

Snoopy
tektronix!tekecs!doghouse.TEK!snoopy