Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site bmcg.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!petrus!bellcore!decvax!ittatc!dcdwest!sdcsvax!bmcg!bobn From: bobn@bmcg.UUCP (Bob Nebert) Newsgroups: net.space Subject: Re: Oh My God Message-ID: <2045@bmcg.UUCP> Date: Wed, 29-Jan-86 15:26:26 EST Article-I.D.: bmcg.2045 Posted: Wed Jan 29 15:26:26 1986 Date-Received: Sat, 1-Feb-86 03:49:26 EST References: <8601281921.AA01471@s1-b.arpa> Organization: Burroughs Corp. ASG, San Diego, CA. Lines: 31 > What will happen next? Some predictions: > > The shuttle program is in very serious trouble, and stands a good > chance of being transfered to the military or being cancelled entirely. > Work will start immediately on a replacement vehicle, probably a smaller > scramjet-based TAV. The Europeans will go ahead with Hermes and HOTOL. > The space station will be postponed or suspended pending the development > of a replacement vehicle. NASA may feel compelled to invest heavily > in space robotics. > > NASA will probably survive, unless it comes out that NASA has been > hushing up internal uneasiness about shuttle reliability. In that case > the civilian space program is very likely dead. > > What a nightmare. WAIT A MINUTE!! Of course the explosion was tragic but before everybody runs out and makes wild predictions, take a second. This has been the first in-flight fatality. Given the COMPLEX equipment and varied experiments, not to mention the evolution of the spacecraft itself, I'm suprised it hasn't happen sooner. NOTE: I'M JUST AS HORRIFIED AS EVERYONE ELSE. If by your logic above, the first crash or explosion on a aircraft should have transfered the CAB (or whatever it was called back then) to military control. That's nonsense. It was a tragic event, but everyone hopefully will learn and get better by it. BTW NASA checks, rechecks and double rechecks all work. They have an excellent safety record and I have faith in future launches.