Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83 based; site hou2g.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!hou2g!devils1
From: devils1@hou2g.UUCP (D.DARBY)
Newsgroups: net.space,net.columbia
Subject: Re: Shuttle Privatization
Message-ID: <796@hou2g.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 3-Feb-86 18:19:01 EST
Article-I.D.: hou2g.796
Posted: Mon Feb  3 18:19:01 1986
Date-Received: Wed, 5-Feb-86 01:10:13 EST
References: <327@vger.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Holmdel NJ
Lines: 34
Keywords: shuttle
Xref: watmath net.space:5523 net.columbia:1978

>In the last few years several private organizations have tried to purchase one
>or more shuttle orbiters to operate for profit. Prudential Insurance lead one of
>these attempts and Astrotech International is still trying.  With federal
>dollars being scarce and given the recent loss of Challenger, perhaps it is time
>to privatize part of the shuttle fleet if industry is still interested.
>
>One attractive approach is to sell Columbia or Discovery to a private


They won't get their hands on Columbia because the government wants it 
for military purposes.  It is currently being prepared to be shipped to it's
new permanent home at Vandenberg.


>organization for the cost of building an additional orbiter.  This way investors
>can get an immediate return and the funds to increase the shuttle fleet are made
>available.  Should the private party miss payments to Rockwell for the new
>orbiter, the government could re-possess the privatized shuttle; thus, the
>government minimizes risk.
>
>If several firms wanted to take advantage of this deal, then additional orbiters
>could be built; although the government should probably keep control of at least
>one orbiter (probably Atlantis).

I thought Atlantis was only a prototype.


    (too much time to think...
     maybe I should do some work.....
              Naaahh !        )
					   dave darby
					   AT&T Bell Labs
					   Holmdel, NJ