Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 exptools; site ihuxx.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!ihuxx!eec3 From: eec3@ihuxx.UUCP (e. cumberland) Newsgroups: net.space Subject: Re: Shuttle escape question answered Message-ID: <961@ihuxx.UUCP> Date: Wed, 5-Feb-86 02:38:16 EST Article-I.D.: ihuxx.961 Posted: Wed Feb 5 02:38:16 1986 Date-Received: Thu, 6-Feb-86 21:35:22 EST References: <814@decwrl.DEC.COM> Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories Lines: 11 > liftoff. That is an AVERAGE speed of 500 mph (assuming it went straight up, > which it did not). If you assume linear acceleration (not true either, but > what the hell), that means that the shuttle was going 1000 MPH when it blew. > Want to guess at the chances of surviving an ejection at 1000MPH at 52000 feet? The speed of the Challenger at the moment of the blast was quoted in the news as 1997 MPH. Although the air is much less dense at 52000 feet, to be thrust into the air stream passing at that speed would probably have the same result as hitting a brick wall at 70. Edwin E. Cumberland III