Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site watnot.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!watnot!agparghi
From: agparghi@watnot.UUCP (Amit Parghi)
Newsgroups: net.space
Subject: Re: Television coverage
Message-ID: <11454@watnot.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 6-Feb-86 20:00:11 EST
Article-I.D.: watnot.11454
Posted: Thu Feb  6 20:00:11 1986
Date-Received: Fri, 7-Feb-86 20:43:03 EST
References: <11627@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> <15019@rochester.UUCP> <192@sivax.UUCP>
Reply-To: agparghi@watnot.UUCP (Amit Parghi)
Organization: U of Waterloo, Ontario
Lines: 33
Summary: Slightly off topic . . .

In article <192@sivax.UUCP> jim@sivax.UUCP (Jim Boman) writes:
> Why don't you go to Canada or the
>Soviet Union if you'd like to have your information controlled. 

Dear Jim,
	My I ask you WHY Canada is an example of having "your information
controlled"?  The ONLY relevant case that comes to my mind is a possible
instance of newspaper anti-trust.  I don't see how anyone with 20/20
vision could honestly call Canada's information "controlled"; might you be 
referring to something of which I'm not aware?
    In any case, we don't have
	Accuracy in Media
	Accuracy in Academia
	National Coalition on Television Violence
	The Washington Wives
	The K.G.B.
	TASS
	etc.

No offense at all intended to the many, many Americans out there, but
I really think that flames and miscellaneous accusations should be
fully researched and backed up before being thrown around like confetti.

 - Amit Parghi

-- 
   Amit PARGHI
   St Jerome's College, WATERLOO, Ontario, N2L 3G3, Canada.
      
    UUCP:   {ihnp4,decvax,allegra,clyde,utzoo}!watmath!watnot!agparghi
    CSNET:  agparghi%watnot@waterloo.CSNET
    ARPA:   agparghi%watnot%waterloo.csnet@csnet-relay.ARPA
    BITNET: agparghi@WATDCSU.BITNET