Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/17/84; site hao.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!ittatc!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!trwrb!trwrba!cepu!hao!woods
From: woods@hao.UUCP (Greg Woods)
Newsgroups: net.sport.football
Subject: RE: BRONCS
Message-ID: <1921@hao.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 23-Jan-86 17:40:43 EST
Article-I.D.: hao.1921
Posted: Thu Jan 23 17:40:43 1986
Date-Received: Sun, 26-Jan-86 04:26:05 EST
References: <289@drutx.UUCP>
Organization: High Altitude Obs./NCAR, Boulder CO
Lines: 18

> >Just look at what happened to the Broncos against
> >Pittsburgh in the playoffs last year.
> >
> >--Greg
> >
> . . .  Just look at what happened to the Broncos last year - they
> were beaten by a better team!!!

  Just as with the current situation (which is why I brought up this example!),
it depends on your definition of "better". Clearly, since they won the game,
the Steelers were "better" than the Broncos ON THAT PARTICULAR DAY. What I
meant was that the Broncos looked better ON PAPER based on their performance
over the whole season (having won more games in a tougher division). This game,
the Bears may look better "on paper", but my point was that it depends on
who is better this Sunday who will win the Super Bowl. I should think this
is obvious, regardless of where your heart lies in either of these situations.

--Greg