Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 (Tek) 9/28/84 based on 9/17/84; site tekig4.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!petrus!bellcore!decvax!decwrl!pyramid!hplabs!tektronix!tekig5!tekig4!maxg
From: maxg@tekig4.UUCP (Max Guernsey)
Newsgroups: net.sport.football
Subject: Re: superbowl post-mortem
Message-ID: <475@tekig4.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 27-Jan-86 11:44:25 EST
Article-I.D.: tekig4.475
Posted: Mon Jan 27 11:44:25 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 1-Feb-86 02:11:11 EST
References: <2b87c831.2a75@apollo.uucp>
Reply-To: maxg@tekig4ernsey.UUCP (Max Guernsey)
Organization: Tektronix, Beaverton OR
Lines: 16

In article <2b87c831.2a75@apollo.uucp> tbg@apollo.uucp (Tom Gross) writes:
>
>    Now that SUPERBOWL XX is over, it's time to think
>    about next year.  Although the PATS' victory in 
>    New Orleans was impressive, I don't think this
>    necessarily signals the start of a new dynasty
>    in the NFL (maybe the AFC east, but the whole league?).
>    By the same token, I don't think the BEARS are nearly
>    as bad as they looked against the PATS; New England
>    was a team that finally hit its stride in the Playoffs,
>    and probably did play over its head (as a team) to win
                       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
chortle chortle , grin grin

As someone on the net said the Bears only need excuses for ONE
game, how many games does your team need excuses for.