Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 (Tek) 9/28/84 based on 9/17/84; site tekig4.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!tektronix!tekig5!tekig4!maxg From: maxg@tekig4.UUCP (Max Guernsey) Newsgroups: net.sport.football Subject: Re: PATS IN SEVEN Message-ID: <482@tekig4.UUCP> Date: Wed, 29-Jan-86 17:12:54 EST Article-I.D.: tekig4.482 Posted: Wed Jan 29 17:12:54 1986 Date-Received: Sat, 1-Feb-86 04:47:02 EST References: <2b974567.2a75@apollo.uucp> Reply-To: maxg@tekig4ernsey.UUCP (Max Guernsey) Organization: Tektronix, Beaverton OR Lines: 27 Summary: In article <2b974567.2a75@apollo.uucp> tbg@apollo.uucp (Tom Gross) writes: > Anyway, to get back to net.sport.football, in game 1 > of the series yesterday I believe that if Stanley Morgan > had not dropped Eason's second pass he would have scored on that > play and the outcome of the game might well have been > completely different: much more than just the additional If I hada... If they hada.... BUT the Pats were thrashed. > four points; I believe the psychological effect on both > teams would have been significant. Eason missing 3 consecutive > passing attempts at the start of the day did not help. > On the other hand I give credit to Jim McMahon's acupuncturist > for his unexpectedly good passing. I think Chicago's ability > to go deep was a surprise to most Patriot fans, but I equate > that with Danny Ainge's perimeter shooting in the first quarter > of game one of last year's NBA finals, i.e. an unexpected streak > of greatness from a BYU alumnus. Time will tell of course, > but I don't think the BEARS can count on that kind of performance > from McMahon throughout the series. > > Does anybody really think the Bears can beat the Patriots > in a best of seven series? Yes! I don't think the Pats would want to play seven games and have to face Dent, Hamilton, Singeltary, Perry for seven games in a season, let alone in a row. Max Guernsey