Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 exptools; site ihuxa.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!ihuxa!nsfadm From: nsfadm@ihuxa.UUCP (B A Carpenter) Newsgroups: net.sport.football Subject: Re: Re: PATS IN SEVEN Message-ID: <785@ihuxa.UUCP> Date: Thu, 6-Feb-86 10:12:14 EST Article-I.D.: ihuxa.785 Posted: Thu Feb 6 10:12:14 1986 Date-Received: Fri, 7-Feb-86 21:20:57 EST References: <2b974567.2a75@apollo.uucp> <8593@ucla-cs.ARPA> <37@tekchips.UUCP> <572@philabs.UUCP> Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories Lines: 32 > > It's curious that all discussion seems to assume that football did > not exist before Superbowl I. Just because they didn't call their > championship game "Superbowl" does not mean that it was inferior. > If we want to see a great romp, and a defensive gem, how about the > '62 Packers over the NY Giants by 37-0? That's a bigger margin than > this year's Bears, and a shutout, too. > > Of course, that WAS a dynasty, so maybe the Bears are going to be one, > too. But it's awfully tough to repeat. This isn't hockey, where > everybody who wins a Stanley Cup repeats for a few years. This is > the NPL (National Parity League), and next year EVERYBODY will have > a version of the 46 defense (two linebackers on one side, etc.) > and every offensive coach is spending the off-season designing > schemes to deal with such defenses. Things always even out. > And it's difficult to imagine the Bears winning several Superbowls > in a row, unless Payton plays until he is 40. > > Paul Benjamin *** REPLACE THIS MESS WITH YOUR BEST *** I think championship games prior to the super bowls are less significant. Its hard to compare the `86 Bears to the `62 Packers because their were only 12 teams in the league in `62. The Bears had to get by 28 teams! I do agree that the Packers did look unbeatable between 62-67,,, But was their competition comparable to the teams today... I guess in the Packers case, proved they were that good since they won the 1st two super bowls... Brian Carpenter