Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 (Denver Mods 7/26/84) 6/24/83; site drutx.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!mtuxo!drutx!djvh
From: djvh@drutx.UUCP (VanHandelDJ)
Newsgroups: net.sport.football
Subject: RE: Bears
Message-ID: <551@drutx.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 12-Feb-86 09:56:17 EST
Article-I.D.: drutx.551
Posted: Wed Feb 12 09:56:17 1986
Date-Received: Fri, 14-Feb-86 01:13:03 EST
Organization: AT&T Information Systems Laboratories, Denver
Lines: 23

> 
> A lot of us thought the Pats had a chance if the game stayed close,
> because they had won a lot of close games this year and the Bears simply
> hadn't been in any. If the game was tied in the third quarter, the Bears
> would have been in a situation they hadn't seen all year. We can say the 
> Patriots would have reacted favorably to this situation because they had done
> so numerous times. How would the Bears have reacted? We don't know but my
> guess is that their greatness would have shown through more than ever and they
> would have won by two touchdowns. 
> 
> Just a hunch.
> 
> Mark Fredrickson
>
	This DID happen.  In the game against the PACKERS, Chicago
seemed to just be going thru the motions.  Then GB scored a TD to go up
10-9.  Chicago came right back and took the lead, winning 16-10.
	Any way you look at it, the Bears were by far the best this year
(Of course that's just my opinion, Bob).


				Dave Van Handel