Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site cbsck.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!cbsck!swc From: swc@cbsck.UUCP (Scott W. Collins) Newsgroups: net.startrek Subject: Re: COTEOF Message-ID: <1905@cbsck.UUCP> Date: Wed, 29-Jan-86 15:45:27 EST Article-I.D.: cbsck.1905 Posted: Wed Jan 29 15:45:27 1986 Date-Received: Thu, 30-Jan-86 06:42:43 EST Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories , Columbus Lines: 33 ~ PLEASE! It is COTEOF, not CATEOF ("on", not "at")... If the first recording done by Spock ended when McCoy went through, it would have ended prior to Edith's salvation from death, hence it would not have recorded it (for either type of outcome). If the first recording ended upon the saving of Edith's life, then it would have recorded the saving and not a traffic fatality. So, when would the fatality outcome have been recorded into the tricorder? My guess is that prior to Spock and Kirk entering through, there were two parallel pasts simultaneously "running": the original one and the one that McCoy created. Both were played by the Guardian as they both happened(?), but only one would be active on the stack (:-) and hence that is the one that Kirk and Spock experienced. Still, Spock had both in his tricorder. Had someone else been recording after THEY entered, a third history would have been recorded: (1) The original with Edith being killed on her own, (2) the one where McCoy only went back to the past and saved Edith, and (3) the one where all three were there and Edith died due to Kirk preventing McCoy from saving her. However, since they were gone "only a moment", they wouldn't have had time to view the recording (er, if they had the ships computers). Whew! It's like trying to figure out "Somewhere in Time" with Christopher Reeve and Jane Seymour (sp?): did Chris go back in time because he was there in a previous life or because he had traveled back in time....??(huh?) (I'm not cut out for recursive thinking; especially if there is no end-condition or starting point...). Scott W. Collins