Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site ssc-vax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!lsuc!pesnta!pyramid!decwrl!decvax!tektronix!uw-beaver!ssc-vax!gcc
From: gcc@ssc-vax.UUCP (Greg C Croasdill)
Newsgroups: net.startrek,net.sf-lovers
Subject: Re: "His was the most human"
Message-ID: <553@ssc-vax.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 10-Feb-86 14:37:18 EST
Article-I.D.: ssc-vax.553
Posted: Mon Feb 10 14:37:18 1986
Date-Received: Wed, 12-Feb-86 01:20:05 EST
References: <1623@mtgzz.UUCP> <9315@ritcv.UUCP> <1804@jhunix.UUCP>
Organization: Boeing Aerospace Co., Seattle, WA
Lines: 37
Xref: lsuc net.startrek:846 net.sf-lovers:5969

First a little article came out, making the point that the writers
might think a little bit more or something.


> > > For reasons of my own, I just saw the end of STAR TREK II:
> > > THE WRATH OF KHAN.  That is the one that has Spocks's tear-
	(more reasonable stuff)
> > > problems always was made to sound better in the end, even
> > > though it probably would have gotten everyone killed if it
> > > wasn't Spock logically choosing the human solution.
> > > ...


Then 2 bozos (who think that Star Trek was shot on location) wrote
back, because, their godhead had been besmurched (sp?)


> > IF this was supposed to be sarcastic or funny or something like that...
> >    ignore this reply.  Otherwise...
> > WHO ARE YOU TO CRITICIZE STAR TREK ? ? ?
> > If you don't like the way it was written/produced/developed/etc. then
> > DON'T WATCH IT and DON'T BOTHER US WITH YOUR COMPLAINTS ! ! !
> > THANK YOU !  !  !
> > 					Paul M.
> 
> I agree totally with you, Paul...
>  
> -- 

*** REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR MaSSAGE ***

 
Watch out Jim these men are Klingon spies.

Greg C.

'In criticism, we find growth'  (_the book of common sense_)