Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!lsuc!pesnta!pyramid!decwrl!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!mcvax!ukc!kcl-cs!flynn
From: flynn@kcl-cs.UUCP (ZNAC429)
Newsgroups: net.startrek,net.sf-lovers
Subject: Re: "His was the most human"
Message-ID: <624@neon.kcl-cs.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 10-Feb-86 08:54:20 EST
Article-I.D.: neon.624
Posted: Mon Feb 10 08:54:20 1986
Date-Received: Thu, 13-Feb-86 05:02:46 EST
References: <1623@mtgzz.UUCP> <9315@ritcv.UUCP>
Reply-To: flynn@kcl-cs.UUCP (Anthony Flynn)
Organization: Department of Computing, Kings College, University of London.
Lines: 23
Xref: lsuc net.startrek:850 net.sf-lovers:5979

In article <1623@mtgzz.UUCP> , "Paul M." writes:
>IF this was supposed to be sarcastic or funny or something like that...
>   ignore this reply.  Otherwise...
>
>WHO ARE YOU TO CRITICIZE STAR TREK ? ? ?
>
>If you don't like the way it was written/produced/developed/etc. then
>DON'T WATCH IT and DON'T BOTHER US WITH YOUR COMPLAINTS ! ! !
>
>THANK YOU !  !  !
>
>					Paul M.

	AND WHO ARE YOU TO DISMISS THE OPINIONS OF OTHERS SIMPLY BECAUSE
THEY HOLD OPINIONS DIFFERENT TO YOUR OWN?? There is no "pre-requisite"
to criticise "Star Trek"; it's just a tv program like any other. That
some people find it necessary to elevate it to the status whereby
criticism , implied or otherwise, is next to sacrilege is very sad. 
That is their own PROBLEM however, and has no place in "sf-lovers" 
where people are (or should be) able to express an opinion without 
having it shouted-down because others disagree.
			Comments anyone..?
				A.Flynn