Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!mcvax!ukc!kcl-cs!thornton
From: thornton@kcl-cs.UUCP (ZNAC468)
Newsgroups: net.startrek,net.sf-lovers
Subject: Re: "His was the most human"
Message-ID: <626@neon.kcl-cs.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 11-Feb-86 07:58:45 EST
Article-I.D.: neon.626
Posted: Tue Feb 11 07:58:45 1986
Date-Received: Fri, 14-Feb-86 06:09:58 EST
References: <1623@mtgzz.UUCP> <9315@ritcv.UUCP> <624@neon.kcl-cs.UUCP>
Reply-To: thornton@kcl-cs.UUCP (znac468)
Organization: Department of Computing, Kings College, University of London.
Lines: 25
Xref: linus net.startrek:4029 net.sf-lovers:11239

In article <624@neon.kcl-cs.UUCP> flynn@kcl-cs.UUCP (Anthony Flynn) writes:
>In article <1623@mtgzz.UUCP> , "Paul M." writes:
>>
>>WHO ARE YOU TO CRITICIZE STAR TREK ? ? ?
>>If you don't like the way it was written/produced/developed/etc. then
>>DON'T WATCH IT and DON'T BOTHER US WITH YOUR COMPLAINTS ! ! !
>>					Paul M.
>
>	AND WHO ARE YOU TO DISMISS THE OPINIONS OF OTHERS SIMPLY BECAUSE
>THEY HOLD OPINIONS DIFFERENT TO YOUR OWN?? 
>				A.Flynn
>
	I quite agree (with A.Flynn that is!). It is not in the spirit of
 IDIC to deny others their own opinions simply because they are not shared
by a majority. Such judgements are subjective in the extreme.
	Anyone can criticize anything they wish (Governments allowing!).
CRITICISM:
	Even though Star Trek is so popular etc,it is still loaded with errors
as is any SF venture (if you look hard enough!). ITS STILL *GOOD* THOUGH!!

				Andy  T.

	("WHO ARE YOU TO SAY WHAT DAMAGE HAS BEEN DONE CAPTAIN!..")

	("..WHO DO I HAVE TO BE ?..")		T C of T K.