Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.7.0.10 $; site uiucdcsp
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!mhuxv!mhuxh!mhuxj!mhuxn!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!uiucdcsp!neth
From: neth@uiucdcsp.CS.UIUC.EDU
Newsgroups: net.tv
Subject: Re: blooper in "Diamonds are Forever"
Message-ID: <17000001@uiucdcsp>
Date: Sat, 25-Jan-86 15:25:00 EST
Article-I.D.: uiucdcsp.17000001
Posted: Sat Jan 25 15:25:00 1986
Date-Received: Mon, 27-Jan-86 03:04:06 EST
References: <3232@hplabsb.UUCP>
Lines: 5
Nf-ID: #R:hplabsb.UUCP:3232:uiucdcsp:17000001:000:243
Nf-From: uiucdcsp.CS.UIUC.EDU!neth    Jan 25 14:25:00 1986


I always wondered if the editor flipped the negative for some "esthetic" reason.
Print journalists regularly flip negatives of pictures of people, so they won't
be "looking off the page".  Is there some similar rule for motion picture
making?