Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 exptools; site ihlpa.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!ihlpa!ibyf
From: ibyf@ihlpa.UUCP (Scott)
Newsgroups: net.tv
Subject: Re: Re: Meta-reports from Moonlighting
Message-ID: <1083@ihlpa.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 3-Feb-86 11:57:30 EST
Article-I.D.: ihlpa.1083
Posted: Mon Feb  3 11:57:30 1986
Date-Received: Wed, 5-Feb-86 00:49:37 EST
References: <153@pedsgo.UUCP>, <1643@jhunix.UUCP> <928@houxa.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Lines: 21

> When I read Evan's article suggesting no more meta-comments, I agreed with
> him 100%.  I was even thinking about posting a similiar article, but he beat
> me to it.  AT FIRST, the meta-comments discussion was interesting, now it is
> BORING!!!  It has dwindled down to half the people on the net watching Moon-
> lighting and then running to work to see if they are the FIRST ONE to post
> the meta-comments.  NO MORE COMMENTS PLEASE!
> 
> Lynn
> houxm!houxa!lmv

Look, every, repeat EVERY moonlighting meta-comments article is posted
as such in the subject line.  If you don't want to read it, hit the  'n'
key instead of posting this useless drivel.  I suppose you also write a
letter to the editor of your local newspaper every time there's an article
you don't want to read.  What?? You don't????  Then quit bitching here!

					Addison
					ihnp4!ihlpa!ibyf

My brother? I always thought of him as mom and dad's science project.