Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site hscfvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!genrad!panda!talcott!wjh12!hscfvax!pavlov
From: pavlov@hscfvax.UUCP (840033@G.Pavlov)
Newsgroups: net.wanted,net.database,net.unix-wizards
Subject: Re: Database software for UNIX systems
Message-ID: <166@hscfvax.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 28-Jan-86 10:21:06 EST
Article-I.D.: hscfvax.166
Posted: Tue Jan 28 10:21:06 1986
Date-Received: Thu, 30-Jan-86 05:48:26 EST
References: <426@godot.UUCP>, <164@hscfvax.UUCP>, <131@wgivax.UUCP>
Organization: Health Sciences Computing Facility, Harvard University
Lines: 10
Xref: watmath net.wanted:8033 net.database:196 net.unix-wizards:16583

>Re: Ingres very buggy on Unix machines:

     I would talk to some current sites before I rejected Ingres on the basis of
     that statement. We ran the same DBMS's (plus Unify and Mistress) and talked
     to apx. 40-50 other sites.  Our evaluation lead to the opposite conclusion;
     we purchased RTI's Ingres.  I do agree with the the general assessment of
     Unify and Informix, however.