Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!think!harvard!seismo!rlgvax!hadron!jsdy
From: jsdy@hadron.UUCP (Joseph S. D. Yao)
Newsgroups: net.unix
Subject: Re: "Idenification Keywords"
Message-ID: <198@hadron.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 24-Jan-86 01:12:11 EST
Article-I.D.: hadron.198
Posted: Fri Jan 24 01:12:11 1986
Date-Received: Sun, 26-Jan-86 04:15:38 EST
References: <722@abic.UUCP>
Reply-To: jsdy@hadron.UUCP (Joseph S. D. Yao)
Organization: Hadron, Inc., Fairfax, VA
Lines: 22
Summary: they work too well.

In article <722@abic.UUCP> crc@abic.UUCP (Clive Charlwood) writes:
>Unfortunately it is incorrect, the section headed
>"Identification Keywords" has a table thus:
>          Keyword   Value
>          get.1     Module name: either the value of the m flag in the
>It Should Read:
>          Keyword   Value
>          %M%       Module name: either the value of the m flag in the

The %M% module keyword worked exactly as advertised.  When get.1
was extracted from s.get.1, the %M% keyword (a relatively late
addition, i think, to the document) was not protected and thus
expanded to the module name "get.1".

Try %\&M\&%, or %\&M% (or %M\&%).

Note that there is a similar problem when archiving C programs
that use multiple printf long-int formats together, as: "%D%O%X%s".
The solution here is to use the l-formats: "%ld%lo%lx%s".
-- 

	Joe Yao		hadron!jsdy@seismo.{CSS.GOV,ARPA,UUCP}