Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site ism780c.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!petrus!bellcore!decvax!ittatc!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!ism780c!tim
From: tim@ism780c.UUCP (Tim Smith)
Newsgroups: net.veg
Subject: Re: \"Aesthetics\"
Message-ID: <344@ism780c.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 28-Jan-86 20:56:45 EST
Article-I.D.: ism780c.344
Posted: Tue Jan 28 20:56:45 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 1-Feb-86 00:23:37 EST
References: <733@decwrl.DEC.COM>
Reply-To: tim@ism780c.UUCP (Tim Smith)
Organization: Interactive Systems Corp., Santa Monica, CA
Lines: 20

In article <733@decwrl.DEC.COM> devi@maisha.DEC (Gita L. Devi PKO1/D1  223-7046) writes:
>>Wouldn't net.misc be a better group for this?  I would assume that
>>most people who read net.veg are vegetarians, and so a more general
>>group, like net.misc, would be more likely to get no-vegetarians
>>involved.
>
>Absolutely not!  This is a net group for vegetarians, and as such, we have 
>every right to express what we want to say.

That "no-vegetarians" is meant to be "non-vegetarians."  If net.veg is
going to contain a discussion on the morality of meat eating, there
should at least be some cross-posting to net.misc, because many people
who might enjoy the discussion would not think of looking in net.veg,
because they would assume that net.veg is for those who are already
convinced that meat eating is not good.

I in no way meant to say that vegetarians don't have a right to express
whatever they want to express.  Sorry if I gave that impression.
-- 
Tim Smith       sdcrdcf!ism780c!tim || ima!ism780!tim || ihnp4!cithep!tim