Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site lanl.ARPA
Path: utzoo!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!cmcl2!lanl!crs
From: crs@lanl.ARPA
Newsgroups: net.women
Subject: Re: Re: Beach harassment:  some questions
Message-ID: <472@lanl.ARPA>
Date: Wed, 29-Jan-86 15:25:01 EST
Article-I.D.: lanl.472
Posted: Wed Jan 29 15:25:01 1986
Date-Received: Fri, 31-Jan-86 01:27:43 EST
References: <8342@ucla-cs.ARPA> <2581@sdcrdcf.UUCP> <6269@tektronix.UUCP> <2585@sdcrdcf.UUCP> <8405@ucla-cs.ARPA> <917@whuxl.UUCP>
Distribution: na
Organization: Los Alamos National Laboratory
Lines: 20

>       If a woman wants to gets a "seamless" tan, and has a
> good book she wants to read, and has a hour or two, what
	.
	.
	.
> normal not to want to be bothered while sunning and reading.
>       If the woman referred to in the original posting had
> been a mite unattractive, would the discussion have taken
> place? Think about it.

	So what is your point?  That men shouldn't be attracted to
	attractive women?  That they should be attracted to unattractive
	women?  Perhaps "unattractive" was a bad choice of words.
-- 
The opinions expressed are not necessarily those of my employer,
the government or your favorite deity.

Charlie Sorsby
...!{cmcl2,ihnp4,...}!lanl!crs
crs@lanl.arpa