Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 exptools; site whuxl.UUCP
Path: utzoo!decvax!bellcore!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!whuxl!stu16
From: stu16@whuxl.UUCP (SMITH)
Newsgroups: net.women
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Beach harassment:  some questions
Message-ID: <932@whuxl.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 31-Jan-86 11:10:51 EST
Article-I.D.: whuxl.932
Posted: Fri Jan 31 11:10:51 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 1-Feb-86 18:11:17 EST
References: <8342@ucla-cs.ARPA> <2581@sdcrdcf.UUCP>
Distribution: na
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Whippany
Lines: 19

> >       If a woman wants to gets a "seamless" tan, and has a
> > good book she wants to read, and has a hour or two, what
> 	.
> 	.
> 	.
> > normal not to want to be bothered while sunning and reading.
> >       If the woman referred to in the original posting had
> > been a mite unattractive, would the discussion have taken
> > place? Think about it.
> 
> 	So what is your point?  That men shouldn't be attracted to
> 	attractive women?  That they should be attracted to unattractive


      A "mite" unattractive can mean slightly overweight,
not as pretty as Cheryl Tiegs, older than a beach bunny or
have a nasty disposition. 
-- 
whuxl!stu16