Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site watdcsu.UUCP Path: utzoo!decvax!bellcore!ulysses!burl!clyde!watmath!watnot!watdcsu!dmcanzi From: dmcanzi@watdcsu.UUCP (David Canzi) Newsgroups: net.women Subject: Re: Re: Beach harassment: some questions Message-ID: <2086@watdcsu.UUCP> Date: Tue, 11-Feb-86 08:55:05 EST Article-I.D.: watdcsu.2086 Posted: Tue Feb 11 08:55:05 1986 Date-Received: Wed, 12-Feb-86 02:55:53 EST References: <8342@ucla-cs.ARPA> <2581@sdcrdcf.UUCP> Reply-To: dmcanzi@watdcsu.UUCP (David Canzi) Distribution: na Organization: U of Waterloo, Ontario Lines: 28 Summary: In article <1394@mhuxt.UUCP> js2j@mhuxt.UUCP (sonntag) writes: >> In article <917@whuxl.UUCP> stu16@whuxl.UUCP (SMITH) writes: >> > If a woman wants to gets a "seamless" tan, and has a >> >good book she wants to read, and has a hour or two, what >> >better place to spend it than on a beach? ... >> >> What sense is there in getting a seamless tan *on* *her* *back* >> *only*? She can't, by undoing the top half of her bikini, get a >> seamless tan on the front of her body or below the waist. I cannot >> convince myself that undoing the back of her bikini was not intended to >> attract men. > > A seamless tan on the back only can be quite nice, I'm sure, as various >types of halters and tops worn in the summer have narrow straps in slightly >different locations. A tan line on the back is often visible. And since >this woman showed absolutely no interest in anything but reading, why do >you find it so hard to believe that she wasn't trying to attract men? Because I had forgotten about summer clothing with narrow straps in the back, and backless dresses, and such. Possibly due to the fact that I haven't seen any lately. So the only other possible reason I could think of was to attract attention, a predictable result of undoing a bikini strap. -- David Canzi "Mothers are fonder than fathers of their children because they are more certain they are their own." -- Aristotle