Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 (Tek) 9/28/84 based on 9/17/84; site midas.UUCP
Path: utzoo!decvax!tektronix!teklds!midas!jeffw
From: jeffw@midas.UUCP (Jeff Winslow)
Newsgroups: net.women
Subject: Re: Re: Beach harassment:  some questions
Message-ID: <142@midas.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 13-Feb-86 14:47:40 EST
Article-I.D.: midas.142
Posted: Thu Feb 13 14:47:40 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 15-Feb-86 00:48:52 EST
References: <8342@ucla-cs.ARPA> <2581@sdcrdcf.UUCP>
Reply-To: jeffw@midas.UUCP (Jeff Winslow)
Distribution: na
Organization: Tektronix, Beaverton OR
Lines: 16

In article <2068@watdcsu.UUCP> dmcanzi@watdcsu.UUCP (David Canzi) writes:
>In article <917@whuxl.UUCP> stu16@whuxl.UUCP (SMITH) writes:
>>      If a woman wants to gets a "seamless" tan, and has a
>>good book she wants to read, and has a hour or two, what
>>better place to spend it than on a beach? ...
>
>What sense is there in getting a seamless tan *on* *her* *back*
>*only*?  She can't, by undoing the top half of her bikini, get a
>seamless tan on the front of her body or below the waist.  I cannot
>convince myself that undoing the back of her bikini was not intended to
>attract men.

Huh? Haven't you ever seen backless evening gowns?

				Jeff Winslow
				"Occam's? Best for Shaving!"