Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.7.0.10 $; site ccvaxa
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!ccvaxa!aglew
From: aglew@ccvaxa.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.arch
Subject: Re: help choosing cache sizes
Message-ID: <5100012@ccvaxa>
Date: Sun, 23-Feb-86 22:59:00 EST
Article-I.D.: ccvaxa.5100012
Posted: Sun Feb 23 22:59:00 1986
Date-Received: Fri, 28-Feb-86 01:09:37 EST
References: <565@scirtp.UUCP>
Lines: 5
Nf-ID: #R:scirtp.UUCP:565:ccvaxa:5100012:000:255
Nf-From: ccvaxa.UUCP!aglew    Feb 23 21:59:00 1986


There's only one optimum cache size - the largest you can afford.
That is, unless you are considering having several layers of different
speed caches, in which case there is an optimization problem for a
given cost. Convex says pretty much the same thing.