Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 alpha 4/15/85; site vger.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!ucbvax!vger!carl From: carl@vger.UUCP (Carl Hewitt) Newsgroups: net.auto Subject: Re: 65 MPH? Message-ID: <345@vger.UUCP> Date: Wed, 19-Feb-86 20:13:09 EST Article-I.D.: vger.345 Posted: Wed Feb 19 20:13:09 1986 Date-Received: Fri, 21-Feb-86 05:19:18 EST References: <152@ttidcc.UUCP> <680@ttidcb.UUCP> Organization: UC Santa Cruz, CIS Dept. Lines: 33 Summary: raising the speed limit to 65 In article <680@ttidcb.UUCP>, svirsky@ttidcb.UUCP (William Svirsky) writes: > In article <152@ttidcc.UUCP> paulb@ttidcc.UUCP (Paul Blumstein) writes: > >LA TIMES, 2/12/86 (excerpts): > > > >The California Highway Patrol and Caltrans (California Department of > >Transportation) recommended ... that the 55-mph speed limit be boosted > >to 65 mph along hundreds of miles of the state freeway system outside > >metropolitan areas. > > > >...the average speed along rural stretches of I5 ... is 63 to 65 mph. > >... people are already goin that fast... > > I saw the same thing on the news. Now my question is if people are > averaging 8-10 mph over the speed limit now, why wouldn't they do > the same with a 65 mph speed limit? My observations are that > most people drive the highway at 5-9 mph over the posted speed > limit regardless of what that limit is. > -- Regardless? I'm sure if the speed limit were 90 MPH, not as many people would exceed it, let alone get to it at all. 65 miles an hour is a good speed on the highway, and by raising it to that, it would satisfy a lot of people who think 55 is too slow, and they would not object to obeying it as much. Thus, instead of a 50% lawless rate, it might go down to 25-30%, and California would start getting more highway money. -- Carl C. Hewitt ------------------------------------ | uucp: ucbvax!ucscc!carl | | Bitnet: CONCCH at UCSCVM | | CSnet: carl@ucsc | ------------------------------------