Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site watrose.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!watnot!watrose!tohaapanen From: tohaapanen@watrose.UUCP (Tom Haapanen) Newsgroups: net.auto Subject: Re: Mustangs and GTIs (and a story) Message-ID: <7849@watrose.UUCP> Date: Wed, 26-Feb-86 11:06:24 EST Article-I.D.: watrose.7849 Posted: Wed Feb 26 11:06:24 1986 Date-Received: Fri, 28-Feb-86 05:48:38 EST References: <158@druhi.UUCP> Reply-To: tohaapanen@watrose.UUCP (Tom Haapanen) Organization: University of Waterloo, Ontario Lines: 66 In article <158@druhi.UUCP> vuser@druhi.UUCP (GerardenC) writes: > >> You're right... the GTI is not a sports car. Most all GTI owners >>would not assume so. Only Chuck seems to be hung up on this. Who is > >Then why are all you nuts touting .85 skidpad figures, >fantastic hp/weight claims, great handling, "sporty interiors", (two >colors at once ) pirelli p6 tires (real crap), 5 speed gearboxes, >on,and on , and on, and on, and on, and on, and on , and on ,and on .......... OK, Chuck, get it straight: GTI is a sporty hatchback. That means it's allowed to have a nice interior, good performance (not amazing), a good gearbox and nice tires. The new GTI's have P600 tires, not P6. They're crap? Do you prefer Mickey Thompson Indy Specials? >Is the only thing a real sport car has over GTI's is the lack of rear seats? YOU said that, Chuck. No one else did. A real sports car (and in my opinion a Mustang GT does not qualify either) will provide performance without compromise. Cars such as Cobra 427, Lotus Super 7, Porsche 911 RS, 924 Carrera GTS, and Speedster qualify as real sports cars in my opinion. >>> A question for all you fanatics: if VW calls them rabbits, why did >>> they put a wolf on the steering wheel? >> >> Chuck...I believe you may be refering to the Wolfsburg symbol on >>some VW's. That is where some Rabbits are made...Wolfsburg Germany. >>Why you would bring up such a benign gripe when you do not even know >>what the hell it is all about, is beyond me.BIG DEAL! > >OK, I guess I dont know what it is all about. You see I dont think I >would ask such a leading question on the net about VW's unless I already >knew the answer. My impression (from fanatics) was that the wolf (or fox) on the >wheel was an AUDI part. It has nothing to do with WOLFSBURG,Germany. >A few fanatics have told me that vw used some AUDI parts on their cars. >And for your information most of (not all) vw's for the US are made in >Westmorland Pa. The Audi logo is four interrlocked rings, quite different from the wolf. You will not find the wolf logo on any Audi. The logo is in fact a (stylized) coat of arms of Wolfsburg. Incidentally, the town was founded on a German moor in 1936 by a certain Adolf Hitler, as "Der Stadt den KdF-Wagen" when the VW factory construction first began. It subsequently was changed to Wolfsburg after a medieval castle situated near the town. (KdF == Kraft durch Freude == Strength through Joy). Most VW's for the US come from Germany -- check the sales figures, Chuck (available weekly in Automotive News). Combined Jetta, Quantum, Scirocco, Vanagon and Cabriolet sales exceed the Golf sales. There indeed are many parts common between VW's and Audis. It just so happens that Audi is part of Volkswagenwerk AG, and it only makes sense to rationalize production where possible. The older Audi 5000's still used a (modified) Beetle inside door handle --- why change it if it works well? >PS: "The best way to fight VW fanatics, is to let em fight each other" You're not having much success there, Chuck! \tom haapanen watmath!watrose!haapanen I'm all lost in the Supermarket I can no longer shop happily I came in here for that special offer Guaranteed personality (c) The Clash, 1979