Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site steinmetz.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!houxm!whuxl!whuxlm!akgua!mcnc!ncsu!uvacs!edison!steinmetz!davidsen From: davidsen@steinmetz.UUCP (Davidsen) Newsgroups: net.auto Subject: Re: Mustangs and GTIs [a FLAME to net abusers from daw1] Message-ID: <668@steinmetz.UUCP> Date: Fri, 28-Feb-86 10:29:53 EST Article-I.D.: steinmet.668 Posted: Fri Feb 28 10:29:53 1986 Date-Received: Sun, 2-Mar-86 19:10:29 EST References: <144@druhi.UUCP> <729@ihlpm.UUCP> <601@mhuxl.UUCP> Reply-To: davidsen@kbsvax.UUCP (Davidsen) Organization: GE CRD, Schenectady, NY Lines: 31 Summary: unproductive approach In article <601@mhuxl.UUCP> daw1@mhuxl.UUCP (Douglas A. Williams) writes: > And I really know you >are a dumb *&%#% when you leave the "REPLACE THIS LINE WITH..." >line in your article. If you don't know how to use the net the right >way, ask someone or read net.announce.newusers! > Several points: 1) This belongs in net.flame, and a polite *mail* to frequent offenders would probably produce better results. Saying "you are a jerk" on the net is not as likely to produce results as saying "there is a better way" in private. 2) Some people leave "REPLACE THIS LINE" to avoid typing "food for the line eater", or losing the first line of their message. I suspect that when lines are no longer eaten things will get better. 3) I completely agree with your comments about quoting more of an old posting than is needed, and continued reminders will hopefully product improvement. This applies to the whole net, not just this newsgroup, but if it were posted to net.general on of the net.selfstyled.gods would probably condemn it is "inappropriate to net.general" and quote the whole thing in doing so. -- -bill davidsen seismo!rochester!steinmetz!--\ / \ ihnp4! unirot ------------->---> crdos1!davidsen \ / chinet! ---------------------/ (davidsen@ge-crd.ARPA) "It seemed like a good idea at the time..."