Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!ucbvax!aviation
From: LShilkoff.ES@XEROX.COM
Newsgroups: net.aviation
Subject: Re: Airport Fog
Message-ID: <860304-104708-2356@Xerox>
Date: Tue, 4-Mar-86 13:46:00 EST
Article-I.D.: Xerox.860304-104708-2356
Posted: Tue Mar  4 13:46:00 1986
Date-Received: Fri, 7-Mar-86 04:06:23 EST
References: <491@ssc-bee.UUCP>
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 10

I can see one negative on the proposal in that running a turbojet engine
at high RPM's for an extended period of time on the ground could have a
detrimental effect on the life of the engine. Typically, an engine is
not run on the ground at high levels for but a minute or two since
take-off occurs shortly thereafter. The ground is a very dirty area for
a turbo jet engine and the particles drawn into the engine could
drastically reduce it's life. Perhaps something other than an aircraft
can be used.

Larry