Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site reed.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!tektronix!reed!soren From: soren@reed.UUCP (Soren Petersen) Newsgroups: net.comics Subject: Re: Pelius and Melisande Message-ID: <2514@reed.UUCP> Date: Sun, 16-Feb-86 03:55:32 EST Article-I.D.: reed.2514 Posted: Sun Feb 16 03:55:32 1986 Date-Received: Mon, 17-Feb-86 06:09:42 EST References: <912@rlgvax.UUCP> <2467@reed.UUCP> <15255@rochester.UUCP> Reply-To: soren@reed.UUCP (Soren Petersen) Organization: Reed College, Portland, Oregon Lines: 35 <15255@rochester.UUCP> ciaraldi@rochester.UUCP (Mike Ciaraldi) writes: >I have to take exception with this. I just read Pelleas & Mellisande >yesterday, both issues back-to-back, and I felt very disappointed. >The artwork was great, but the story was not so hot, especially >all the loose ends, abrupt transitions, and lack of time sense. > >Maybe I'm just dense, but this looks like bad storytelling >all around. Maybe this is what it means to be "symbolist", >or "pre-modern", but it just seems like bad craftsmanship. > >Uh-oh, now someone will reply and explain all this stuff, and >I'll look terribly low-brow. Oh well, nothing new... Firstly, I suppose I should apologize for throwing around literary terms without (1)explaining them, and (2)properly understanding them myself. As far as 'pre-modern' goes, I meant very late Romantic. The end of the nineteenth century was characterized, at least artistically, by a definite sense that something was not quite right in Denmark, but without any idea just what. P&M, (the play) was full of this. The whole kingdom is founded on rottenness, the kingdom is in the midst of a major famine and everyone is dying. The true 'story' is about how this corruption destroys the innocence represented by Pelius, Melisande and their love. The plot is not important in itself, the true 'action' is symbolic. I read the play, immediately before reading the comic, so I cannot say how much sense the comic makes on its own. I enjoyed both immensely, without really understanding exactly what was going on myself. If anyone would like to post a detailed analysis, I would be grateful. Thanks (as they say) in advance Have a Nice Day soren Petersen