Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site hropus.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!houxm!hropus!ka From: ka@hropus.UUCP (Kenneth Almquist) Newsgroups: net.invest Subject: Mexico Fund (disadvantages of closed end funds) Message-ID: <285@hropus.UUCP> Date: Sun, 16-Feb-86 00:09:31 EST Article-I.D.: hropus.285 Posted: Sun Feb 16 00:09:31 1986 Date-Received: Mon, 17-Feb-86 04:57:08 EST Organization: Bell Labs, Holmdel, NJ Lines: 29 In my article on the First Australia Fund, I stated that open ended funds were generally preferable to closed end funds. An example is the Mexico Fund, which trades on the New York Stock Exchange at a bit over $2 a share, or about half of the net asset value per share. I can make a fairly confident guess at the history of this fund. It was probably launched when all the experts were predicting that oil prices could go nowhere but up. When oil prices went down instead, Mexico, with its large foreign debt, was put in an economic bind, and was forced to take drastic austerity measures which made investing in Mexico unappealing. Had the Mexico Fund been an open ended fund, investors could have redeemed their shares at the net asset value, possibly forcing the fund out of business. But since the Mexico Fund is a closed end fund, the only option open to investors was to sell their shares to someone else. Since nobody else wanted to invest in Mexico either, investors who wanted to get out were forced to sell their shares at far less than the net asset value. While the fact that the Mexico Fund is closed ended has proved disas- trous for the investors who bought it at near the net asset value, it does provide an opportunity to anyone who is bullish on Mexico now. If the Mexican economy improves, not only will the value of the holdings of the Mexico Fund increase, but the discount from net asset value will probably decrease as well. Thus you could do a lot better investing in the Mexico Fund than investing in Mexico itself. Does anyone think that Mexico is headed for better times? Kenneth Almquist ihnp4!houxm!hropus!ka (official name) ihnp4!opus!ka (shorter path)