Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!ucbvax!ernie.berkeley.edu!mazlack From: mazlack@ernie.berkeley.edu.BERKELEY.EDU (Lawrence J. &) Newsgroups: net.invest Subject: Re: A comment on "no-load" mutual funds Message-ID: <12132@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> Date: Sun, 2-Mar-86 21:44:21 EST Article-I.D.: ucbvax.12132 Posted: Sun Mar 2 21:44:21 1986 Date-Received: Tue, 4-Mar-86 01:50:11 EST References: <1982@jhunix.UUCP> <317@hsi.UUCP> <9492@ucla-cs.ARPA> Sender: usenet@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Reply-To: mazlack@ernie.berkeley.edu.UUCP (Lawrence J. Mazlack) Organization: University of California, Berkeley Lines: 28 >> I know of no reason whatsoever to invest in a load fund. All the factors >> dictate investing in a true no-load fund will be the superior investment. >> The only people who recommend load funds are the people selling them and >> of course they are not unbiased. A percentage of the load that is paid >> will go straight into their pocket in the form of commissions. >> >> Keith Boucher HSI New Haven, CT > >I agree. As a matter of fact, all Vanguard mutual fund portfolios are >available with no sales commissions. (I think they mean no redemption >fees as well when they make this statement). >So, choosing a "group" of no-load mutual funds which you can exchange >to/from without ever having to worry about loads makes life a little >easier. Then all you do is worry about individual mutual funds performance >within that group. I'll bet you could do even better with that >strategy than on most loaded funds. I own/have owned several different Vanguard funds. None of them had either a front-end or back-end load. Another advantage that Vanguard has is that it has comparatively low management fees. The only disadvantage that I have experienced is that their service is not so great. But, if your management fees are low, they have to save someplace. ....Larry Mazlack mazlack@ernie.edu