Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!harvard!talcott!panda!genrad!decvax!decwrl!glacier!kestrel!ladkin
From: ladkin@kestrel.ARPA (Peter Ladkin)
Newsgroups: net.lang,net.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Integer division: a winner declared
Message-ID: <5032@kestrel.ARPA>
Date: Thu, 20-Feb-86 23:58:10 EST
Article-I.D.: kestrel.5032
Posted: Thu Feb 20 23:58:10 1986
Date-Received: Mon, 24-Feb-86 06:19:27 EST
References: <11610@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> <5100003@ccvaxa> <548@ism780c.UUCP> <5030@kestrel.ARPA>
Organization: Kestrel Institute, Palo Alto, CA
Lines: 13
Keywords: Ada and DoD
Xref: linus net.lang:1926 net.lang.ada:650

In article <5030@kestrel.ARPA>, ladkin@kestrel.ARPA (Peter Ladkin) writes:
> Considering ADA to be flawed - not in one of your cases.

I meant - at least one of the organisations quoted doesn't 
consider ADA to be flawed.

> Having no intention of making it available, again false in two of
> your quoted list.
> From first hand knowledge.

To be read similarly. Sorry for the confusion.

Peter Ladkin