Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site utcs.uucp
Path: utzoo!utcs!wagner
From: wagner@utcs.uucp (Michael Wagner)
Newsgroups: net.lang.f77,net.unix,net.unix-wizards,net.lang
Subject: Re: Any decent Fortrans under Unix ? Which machine ?
Message-ID: <1144@utcs.uucp>
Date: Thu, 6-Mar-86 12:17:45 EST
Article-I.D.: utcs.1144
Posted: Thu Mar  6 12:17:45 1986
Date-Received: Thu, 6-Mar-86 12:29:57 EST
References: <173@cybavax.UUCP> <3274@sun.uucp> <518@ho95e.UUCP>
Reply-To: wagner@utcs.UUCP (Michael Wagner)
Distribution: net
Organization: University of Toronto Computing Services, general purpose UNIX
Lines: 18
Summary: 

In article <518@ho95e.UUCP> wcs@ho95e.UUCP (Bill Stewart 1-201-949-0705 ihnp4!ho95c!wcs HO 2G202) writes:
> [ ... ]   If you're
>talking about IBM-sized machines, run UTS in the daytime and VM at
>night.)  
>
>-- 
># Bill Stewart, AT&T Bell Labs 2G-202, Holmdel NJ 1-201-949-0705 ihnp4!ho95c!wcs


No need to do that.  They co-exist (that's part of the point).  And,
in fact, you probably want to submit to a VM batch subsystem (where
you can get EISPAK and all the other things you mentioned) and only
do the editing on UTS.  Oh, that AMDAHL would only see the light and
make a single-user UTS system, so they could peacefully co-exist
with VM...if you load up your UTS system too heavily, you will have
problems.

Michael Wagner (wagner@utcs)