Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!think!harvard!seismo!brl-adm!brl-smoke!smoke!netinfo%ucbjade@ucb-vax.ARPA From: netinfo%ucbjade@ucb-vax.ARPA (Postmaster + BITINFO) Newsgroups: net.mail.headers Subject: Re: Mail looping Message-ID: <1358@brl-smoke.ARPA> Date: Thu, 27-Feb-86 01:05:03 EST Article-I.D.: brl-smok.1358 Posted: Thu Feb 27 01:05:03 1986 Date-Received: Sun, 2-Mar-86 19:35:31 EST Sender: news@brl-smoke.ARPA Lines: 28 In reply to: Date: Wed 26 Feb 86 00:12:44-PST From: Mark Crispin Subject: Re: Mail looping Message-Id: <12186377826.8.MRC@PANDA> I'd argue that if you really care about loop abatement you will use what SMTP provides to help you out from this -- the EXPN command. That is, the sender fully resolves the destination list. It isn't hard to detect loops when you do this. ------- Unfortunately, mail lists are not limited to the SMTP/RFC822 mail world. So this is only a partial solution. I suspect there is not one fail-safe method and that a varies of methods will be needed to used to reduce looping. One alternative that is less subject to looping is the USENET news distribution system. It is available for Unix systems and shortly will be available for IBM CMS systems. I would prefer to see large mailing lists converted to news groups. It is much nicer to see one message going between news/conference systems than to see several duplications of the same message resulting from mail list explosion being transmitted. I suggest that the USENET article/batch formats be adopted as a standard method of transporting collective address messages between news and conferencing systems. Bill Wells netinfo%ucbjade@Berkeley.EDU