Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site amdahl.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!decwrl!amdcad!amdahl!acs From: acs@amdahl.UUCP (Tony Sumrall) Newsgroups: net.micro.amiga Subject: Re: Unix, etc. Message-ID: <2819@amdahl.UUCP> Date: Thu, 20-Feb-86 12:53:16 EST Article-I.D.: amdahl.2819 Posted: Thu Feb 20 12:53:16 1986 Date-Received: Fri, 21-Feb-86 07:46:53 EST References: <1284@caip.RUTGERS.EDU> Reply-To: acs@amdahl.UUCP (Tony Sumrall) Organization: Amdahl Corporation, Sunnyvale CA Lines: 29 Summary: Oh *really*! In article <1284@caip.RUTGERS.EDU> carroll@aim.rutgers.edu@caip.RUTGERS.EDU writes: > From: " Mark Carroll" > > I tend to agree with the earlier articles here. A Unix like system should > have been used as the primary OS for the Amiga. Yet another proprietary OS > is just a pain. I say Unix since it is a very powerful, and very standard > system. The Microworld is already too full of little OSs, each for one machine. > In the 68000 world, when there are already two Unix-like systems, one of them should be adopted. Modifying the Workbench to accept a Unix type OS would be > a formidable proposition, but worth it for the benefits it would yeild. > > Are you listening Commodore? > > Mark Carroll > Carroll@RU-AIM.Arpa Why does it *have* to be Unix? From the discussions I've seen here quite a few people (who *seem* to be in the know) don't really prefer Unix as a model. I've been using Unix for in excess of 4 years, MS-DOS and CP/M-80 for over 3 and, while I prefer Unix to the other 2, am not against someone making another attempt at providing a "better" operating system/user interface. I must agree that AmigaDOS is not a panacea but I find it easy to use and friendly enough. Course this doesn't mean that you should stop complaining--that's how things get improved. Perhaps some pointed and (more or less) precise suggestions should be proffered. -- Tony Sumrall ...!{ihnp4,hplabs,amd,sun}!amdahl!acs [ Opinions expressed herein are the author's and should not be construed to reflect the views of Amdahl Corp. ]