Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.7.0.10 $; site uiucdcsb
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!uiucdcsb!jabusch
From: jabusch@uiucdcsb.CS.UIUC.EDU
Newsgroups: net.micro.pc
Subject: Re: WordPerfect vs MS-Word
Message-ID: <5100121@uiucdcsb>
Date: Wed, 19-Feb-86 10:09:00 EST
Article-I.D.: uiucdcsb.5100121
Posted: Wed Feb 19 10:09:00 1986
Date-Received: Fri, 21-Feb-86 05:49:53 EST
References: <506@imsvax.UUCP>
Lines: 15
Nf-ID: #R:imsvax.UUCP:506:uiucdcsb:5100121:000:652
Nf-From: uiucdcsb.CS.UIUC.EDU!jabusch    Feb 19 09:09:00 1986


	I've seen and used packages that allow up to 10 windows.  This
is for the most part unimportant.  The typical word processor places
at least one status line per window, perhaps Word is different.  At any
rate, this ususally leaves you with 2 or less lines of text when using
8 windows.  I've never seen a word processor in use that had more than
three windows on te screen.  When you get down to one line of text per
window, you're using a fancy line editor!


John W. Jabusch
        CSNET:	jabusch%uiuc@csnet-relay.ARPA
	UUCP:	{ihnp4,convex,pur-ee}!uiucdcs!jabusch
        USENET:	...!{pur-ee,ihnp4}!uiucdcs!jabusch
        ARPA:	jabusch@uiuc.arpa