Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site bsdpkh.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!whuxl!whuxlm!akgua!akguc!codas!bsdpkh!latham
From: latham@bsdpkh.UUCP (Ken Latham)
Newsgroups: net.micro.pc
Subject: Re: WordPerfect vs MS-Word
Message-ID: <169@bsdpkh.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 18-Feb-86 18:11:50 EST
Article-I.D.: bsdpkh.169
Posted: Tue Feb 18 18:11:50 1986
Date-Received: Fri, 21-Feb-86 07:08:19 EST
References: <506@imsvax.UUCP> <1270@osu-eddie.UUCP> <3670@utah-cs.UUCP> <129@fritz.UUCP> <3682@utah-cs.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T-IS (SDSS), Orlando Fl.
Lines: 25

> In article <129@fritz.UUCP>, zemon@fritz.UUCP (Art Zemon) writes:
> > The real point of comparison is not what both program do but
> > what one does that the other does not.  Here is a little list to
> > start things off, things that Microsoft Word does that I don't
> > think WordPerfect does:
> > 
> > Word...
> 
> Does Word:
> Have a thesaurus?
> Keep page boundary indicators current?
> .....
> Escape to DOS?
> 

I refer all those interested in this comparison to:

	 PC-Week Magazine, FEB 11 issue. pp. 71-75

 which does a side by side comparison of word processors.


			Ken Latham, AT&T-IS (via AGS Inc.), Orlando , FL

			uucp: ihnp4!bsdpkh!latham