Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site amdahl.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!decwrl!amdcad!amdahl!gam From: gam@amdahl.UUCP (G A Moffett) Newsgroups: net.news.group Subject: Re: Moderation in Some Things Message-ID: <2792@amdahl.UUCP> Date: Sun, 16-Feb-86 17:19:57 EST Article-I.D.: amdahl.2792 Posted: Sun Feb 16 17:19:57 1986 Date-Received: Tue, 18-Feb-86 03:22:27 EST References: <7031@ki4pv.UUCP> Reply-To: gam@amdahl.UUCP (G A Moffett) Organization: Amdahl Corp, UTS Products Group Lines: 33 Summary: I don't think replacing net.news.group with a mod group is a good idea I am opposed to net.news.group being replaced by mod.news.group. I see the problem that you are talking about, but my objections are two: [1] It ain't that bad [2] I encourage instead the allegedily hopeless task of user training. Net.news.group isn't taking up a lot of disk space, and is in fact rather moderate, so its abuse in that sense is rather minor. I, too, am bothered by the followup message (which often include the entire original article, of course) consisting of simply "me too" or whatever from the poster. But this has been relatively rare. When this does happen, send a (polite!) note to the poster that this sort of thing is discouraged. And besides having polls on creating/removing newsgroups, we also need a public forum to discuss the purpose of existing newsgroups from time to time (should headhunters post to net.jobs? What should we do about net.sources? etc). These postings are not wasteful but encourage common understanding and (hopefully) consensus on what do about certain newsgroup issues. I am have just finished taking a poll via Usenet on another matter. While a few have posted their votes, most have not. More importantly, almost all the votes that were posted also contained reasonable and informative arguments pro/con, and this is quite valuable to the undecided voters to help make their opinions. (Notice that this is a vote, and is being posted to net.news.group. It was originally going to be mailed to ki4pv!tanner but I felt it made sufficient number of important points that I decided to post it instead, because the arguments I provide here may help people decide for themselves how to vote in this matter). -- Gordon A. Moffett ...!{ihnp4,seismo,hplabs}!amdahl!gam