Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 exptools; site whuts.UUCP Path: utzoo!lsuc!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!whuxl!whuts!orb From: orb@whuts.UUCP (SEVENER) Newsgroups: net.politics Subject: Re: Reply to Sevener on Property Rights Message-ID: <550@whuts.UUCP> Date: Wed, 19-Feb-86 10:04:42 EST Article-I.D.: whuts.550 Posted: Wed Feb 19 10:04:42 1986 Date-Received: Sat, 22-Feb-86 09:04:09 EST References: <1691@bbncca.ARPA> <536@whuts.UUCP> <1636@ihlpg.UUCP> <540@whuts.UUCP> <1641@ihlpg.UUCP> Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories Lines: 37 > > Just as the governmental authorities in the > > past used their authority to shoot and kill strikers. Just as ........ > > [Many more irrelevencies omitted] > -------- > Gee Tim, once you get going, you can't stop, even if you stray from > what we were talking about. You are an inveterate polemicist. > Bill Tanenbaum - AT&T Bell Labs - Naperville IL ihnp4!ihlpg!tan It is hardly irrelevant when talking about the denial of current civil rights and the threat this may pose in the future to point out that such things have happened in the past. Most Americans are never taught the history of the labor struggle in this country. How company towns controlled every aspect of people's lives and made a profit on every aspect of their lives. For example, one company town paid their workers with scrip that could *only* be used in company stores. How workers were shot and killed in the defense of the rights of private property. How workers were fired and worse for distributing pro-union literature on private property. During the Palmer Raids unionists and socialists were rounded up and arrested for "subversion". Many were placed in prisons for years. During the McCarthy era many people were fired and blacklisted for simply *knowing* somebody who was a Communist or leftist. The replacement of public town squares with privately owned malls poses the same challenge again: which will be respected, people's basic civil rights of freedom of speech or the rights of private property? I believe in the end that this country *will* follow its deep democratic traditions and protect people's rights to freedom of speech over private property's rights of repression. Just as we finally did in respecting workers' rights to distribute literature on private property and workers rights to strike. But it will not happen without effort. And it is part of the ongoing struggle to increase democracy as was done during the union movement and the civil rights movement. THAT is why history is relevant. tim sevener whuxn!orb