Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site alice.UUCP
Path: utzoo!lsuc!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!alice!jj
From: jj@alice.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.politics
Subject: Re: Line Item Veto at Presidential Level
Message-ID: <5044@alice.uUCp>
Date: Wed, 26-Feb-86 11:42:35 EST
Article-I.D.: alice.5044
Posted: Wed Feb 26 11:42:35 1986
Date-Received: Thu, 27-Feb-86 20:55:36 EST
References: <155@jc3b21.UUCP> <1405@mhuxt.UUCP> <560@whuts.UUCP>, <1410@mhuxt.UUCP>
Organization: New Jersey State Farm for the Terminally Bewildered
Lines: 29


Jeff, Jeff, Jeff.  You don't understand.  Tim S knows for SURE that
Reagan is bad, so he doesn't NEED any evidence. :-(

Seriously, Tim, you ought to look a bit harder at the Social Security
screw-up, and see just WHO, and WHERE the abuses were.  Oddly
enough, you may find antagonized Reagan opponents hoping to embarrass
Reagan.  Wouldn't that be a change, now, and wouldn't it show the
ethics of those responsible.

You know, Tim, over the years you've blamed Reagan for a lot
of things. No, make that EVERYthing.
It's very interesting how you are very careful to not acknowledge
when Reagan does something you agree with, now isn't it, or is it perhaps
that you don't notice, since you know beyond any shadow of a doubt that
the man is evil beyond imagnination?  

RayGun is far from perfect, Tim, but what have you offered us as an alternative?
Nothing.  Nada.  Zip.  Zero.  Sure, you want to complain, but how about
offering some constructive suggestions, like perhaps how to get a
reasonable non-extremist into the president's office?  Why do we have
to choose between Mondull and RayGun?  Carturd and RayGun?  Why not
choose between Dominici and  Bradley?  Why not Fenwick and Byrd?
Why are we going to have to choose between Bush and Cuomo?  GAK!
-- 
TEDDY BEARS HAVE LOTS OF PATIENCE, BUT THEY CAN FIGHT BACK!
"You're loosin' 'em, you're loosin' 'em, hold up your trousers  high!"

(ihnp4;allegra;research)!alice!jj