Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site sdcrdcf.UUCP
Path: utzoo!lsuc!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!ittatc!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!alan
From: alan@sdcrdcf.UUCP (Alan Algustyniak)
Newsgroups: net.politics
Subject: Re: "Russia: Love It Or Leave It"
Message-ID: <2648@sdcrdcf.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 28-Feb-86 15:47:44 EST
Article-I.D.: sdcrdcf.2648
Posted: Fri Feb 28 15:47:44 1986
Date-Received: Sun, 2-Mar-86 08:38:56 EST
References: <1691@bbncca.ARPA> <536@whuts.UUCP> <1636@ihlpg.UUCP> <1121@ihlpa.UUCP> <528@mmm.UUCP> <287@aero.ARPA>
Reply-To: alan@sdcrdcf.UUCP (Alan Algustyniak)
Organization: System Development Corporation R&D, Santa Monica
Lines: 26

I usually don't post to the net because of the time it takes to do the
always-necessary follow-ups, but let me make a quick observation.

In article <287@aero.ARPA> foy@aero.UUCP (Richard Foy) writes:
>>
>There is a very important distiction between a private citizen's house and
>a corporate mall. A corporation is an artificial entity the owners of which
>(shareholders) are protected from any legal action from private people.
>The corporation is a creation of the state, it has a charter from the state,
>therefore it should be subject to the same cival rights requirements that
>apply to the state.
>
>Richard Foy, Redondo Beach, CA

Mr. Foy is here rebutting the idea that the owner of a mall should be
able to refuse entrance to pests, just as the owner of a home can, since
a corporation it subject to the same...[see above].

Note that Mr. Foy, who works for Aerospace Corporation, states, in effect,
that Aerospace Corp. cannot refuse entrance to pests; that if it allows
customers to come in and do business with it, then it must allow
the general public to come in and distribute literature.

	Al Algustyniak

<Now that net.bizarre is gone, i read Sevener's articles. :-) >