Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Path: utzoo!lsuc!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!petrus!bellcore!decvax!ittatc!dcdwest!sdcsvax!ucbvax!brahms!desj
From: desj@brahms.BERKELEY.EDU (David desJardins)
Newsgroups: net.politics
Subject: Re: "Russia: Love It Or Leave It"
Message-ID: <12139@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU>
Date: Mon, 3-Mar-86 05:26:56 EST
Article-I.D.: ucbvax.12139
Posted: Mon Mar  3 05:26:56 1986
Date-Received: Thu, 6-Mar-86 19:17:03 EST
References: <1691@bbncca.ARPA> <536@whuts.UUCP> <1636@ihlpg.UUCP> <1121@ihlpa.UUCP> <528@mmm.UUCP> <287@aero.ARPA>
Sender: usenet@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: desj@brahms.UUCP (David desJardins)
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
Lines: 14

In article <287@aero.ARPA> foy@aero.UUCP (Richard Foy) writes:
>There is a very important distiction between a private citizen's house and
>a corporate mall. A corporation is an artificial entity the owners of which
>(shareholders) are protected from any legal action from private people.
>The corporation is a creation of the state, it has a charter from the state,
>therefore it should be subject to the same cival rights requirements that
>apply to the state.

   This seems a specious argument at best.  Are you saying that you have
the right to distribute literature in a mall owned by a corporation, but
not in one owned by an individual?  Why would this make a difference?
I can't believe that you think this is a relevant distinction!

   -- David desJardins